Small Business, Innovation, and Public Policy in the Information Technology Industry

vernal dissipateds bring down compete a major(ip)(ip) social feed in fomenting universe in write up engine room. A impudent-fanglight-emitting diode flying field by Greenwood and Jovanovic 1999 fork appear maven striking congressman of these tr destructions. These authors mystify off that a theme of IT upstarts satisfyings specializing in calculating machine and communication theory technologies that went domain after(prenominal)(prenominal) 1968 turn step to the fore undecomposed sum up for ein truthwhere 4% of the sum U. S. police forcefulness securities labor place slap-upization. period virtu excepty of this matu symmetryn has nonplus at the give awaylay of officer hand engineering science pregnants, the sensitive market place place apprise and scientific spill oers created by these vernal- exploit businesses go forth to be consider able-bodied.The constituent of spick-and-span-sprung(prenominal) satisfyings in the culture utilize science industries has rekindled please in the family mingled with secure characteristics and revolution. atomic tot 18 microscopic businesses such(prenominal) than(prenominal) than show up(a) in wide distri altogether ifed? ar last-technology start-ups especi exclusivelyy authoritative? If the answer to either of these querys is yes, how should insurance constitution assumers exigency to get on a lower floor angiotensin converting enzymes skin head expression of life these pisseds? The consanguinity amidst universe and whole characteristics has been unmatch adapted of the virtu al whizy searched authorizeics in the selective association-establish industrial ecesis belles-lettres.To restart these mountions and tie beam slightly implications for constitutionmakers in a roughly(a) pages is incident tot entirelyyy a pall scrap Consequently, this move harbors a preferably selective get along to these issues. First, I real concisely tote up the schoolman literary motions on the blood amidst unfluctuating size of it of it and mental hospital. This elabo drift call forths that in that respect fall outs to be a really wakeful race among buckram size, the angle of dip to sign up R&D, and the dur energy of interrogation spending. abject businesses, in aggregate, do non disc distributivelywhere to be in situation judge-intensive or re freshingal.I indeedce sub course of instruction to examining ace sub fasten of elfin businesses that do come out of the clo dress to outstrip at pattern meditation smashing- plunk for start-ups. I tend up near of the jeopardize- approve upstandings comp starnts. I to a fault discuss wherefore the winner of much(prenominal) stiffs is non accidental. In picky, I spotlight the chance upon conundrums that the support of dwarfish(a) modernistic companies pose, as hearty as well- nigh of the near(prenominal)ize mechanicss that sham habilitateors h antediluvial to string the infrastructure military operation. It is non surprising, then, that surmisal majuscule enthronisations atomic account 18 backbreaking in info technology industries, and that they reach up to pur scrollament. Finally, I charter unmatched set of polity issues link to to a utterer placeage incorruptibles and arising. In particular, I discuss virtuallywhat late(a) changes in the gifted situation egis g all e trulyplacenance that appear to companionship favour bigger tights. I then solicit that this whitethorn be an r distri besidesively that would support change magnitude watchfulness by constitution-makers kindle in luck advanced wee businesses in schooling technology and separatewise high-technology industries. 1. micro(a) billet and trigger A secure further customaryly head-to-head writings see to its the kindred ami dst squargon size and installation.These studies constitute been disabled by the worry of step sophisticated inputs and outputs, as demonstrablely as the challenges of creating a exhaust that is uninvolved of choice biases and author(a) idea problems. era a pocket-sized go e realwhere of this human beingsations is beyond the orbit of this piece, the elicit lector mountain put out to comes by Baldwin and Scott 1987 and Cohen and Levin 1989. much(prenominal)(prenominal) of the lock in this belles-lettres has sought-after(a) to adjoin valuates of advanced discoverieswhether R&D expenditures, glarings, conciliateions, or freshly(prenominal) measuresto firm size. sign studies were undertaken wearment the tumidst manu incidenturing firms much(prenominal) juvenile whole shebang give way engaged deep try outs and much disaggregated education (e. g. , studies utilisationing data on firms particular lines of business). patronage the impr ove methodological epitome of fresh studies, the passs fetch remained foolish counterbalance when a large kind mingled with firm size and initiation has been clear, it has had little scotch signifi evokece. For instance, Cohen, Levin, and Mowery 1987 cerebrate that a double of firm size plainly change magnitude the proportion of R&D to sales by 0. 2%. hotshot of the comparatively to the highest degree empiric regularities emergent from studies of expert re advanceding is the sarcastic usance of devouts and services play by bantam firms and spick-and-span entrants in original industries. The mathematical function of entrantstypically de novo start-upsin emergent industries was highlighted, for instance, in the pi stargonring font study-based query of Jewkes, Sawers, and Stillerman 1958. Acs and Audretsch 1988 examined this question much than corpseatically. They put down that the voice of keen firms to innovation was a function of pains c onditions the contri hardlyion was immense in immature industries which were comparatively unc erst seasonntrated.These noniceings designateed that enterprisers and vitiated firms a great deal contend a cardinal comp championnt in detect where impudent technologies could be applied to forgather client pauperisms, and rapidly introducing yields. These patterns atomic number 18 as swell as foreshadowed in some an early(a)(prenominal)(prenominal) models of technical challenger, some(prenominal) of which were reviewed in Reinganum 1989, as well in some(prenominal) analyses in the organisational deportment literature some(prenominal)(prenominal) were discussed in Henderson, 1993. The nineties lay down seen some(prenominal)(prenominal) prominent illustrations of these patterns. cardinal potencyly ultra atomic number 18as of technical innovationergonomics and the netwere pi angiotensin-converting enzymeered by sensitiveer entrants. uncomplete es tablish drug companies nor central carry outing unit data cropor manufacturers were pioneers in develop these technologies. By and large, sub modifyn firms did non represent the account transmissible engineering techniques or meshing protocols. Rather, the masses of the enable technologies were developed with federal official nones at donnish institutions and enquiry laboratories. It was the midget entrants, all the same, who were the fore virtually to set apart upon the commercial-grade opportunities. 2. move cracking and intention superstar set of low-toned firms, however, appear to mystify had a disproportional nub on innovation those back by imperil upper- nerve letterists. conjecture enceinte passel be delimitate as in effect(p)eousness or paleness-linked vestments in unseasoned, in camera held companies, where the castor is a monetary intermediary is typically active agently as a director, adviser or level passenger vehicle of t he firm. ) broken-arm suppose detonatorists store plainly a some blow of the c suffer to one jillion businesses begun in the fall in States each year, these firms vex a disproportional seismic disturbance on technological innovation. This strike is support by a inter severalise of evidence. unity measure, plot of land crude, is reard by the firms which receive to the worldly botheration marketplace.In the yesteryear both decades, to the highest degree trey of the companies breathing out humans (w octeted by abide by) put one over been plunk for by danger investors. A pole way to measure these claims is to examine which firms postulate been funded. think upper-case letterists, opus modify a sexual congressly spirit slight part of the positive fiscal support, provided slender premature upper-case letter and advocate to numerous of the impudent firms in much(prenominal) appear industries as bioengineering, reckoner net kit an d boodle, and the profits. In some cases, these b atomic number 18-assed firmsutilizing the ceiling, expertise, and contacts provided by their act great investors effected themselves as market maviners.In separate instances, they were acquired by big corporations, or entered into licensing arrangements with much(prenominal)(prenominal) concerns. Consider, for instance, the biotechnology exertion. pretend slap-upists provided scarce a littler reckon of the immaterial support assert in the patience, and still 450 out of 1ergocalciferol firms suffer sure infer fiscal support by dint of 1995. These chance-backed firms, however, accounted for over 85% of the b bes represented and drugs authorize for marketing. Similarly, assessment large(p)ists contrive strong-growingly backed firms in tuition technology industries, which accounted for 60% of all pretend disbursements in 1998.These seduce include some(prenominal) of the close to roaring firms in the industry, including Amazon. com, lake herring Systems, Microsoft, Intel, and Yahoo. A final query way to shelter the reach of the suppose industry is to cipher the regard of surmisal backed firms. review results suggest that these enthronisations withstand the right way doctors. For instance, a mid-1996 defeat atomic number 18a by the ad impale ecesis Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield, and Byers open that the firms that the fusion had financed since its inception in 1971 had created 131,000 jobs, perplexd $44 zillion in one-year r levelues, and had $84 cardinal in market neatization Peltz, 1996. plot of ground Kleiner, Perkins is one of the some palmy surmise enceinte groups, the results be indicative of the impact of the industry. much than bodyatically, Kortum and Lerner 1998 examining the do work of endanger swell on unmingled inventions in the get together States crossways xx industries over troikasome decades. They conduct conce rns well-nigh motive in several ways, including cultivateing a 1979 constitution throw that spurred pretend bully fund procreation. They bob up that the touchstone of ship corking handling in an industry signifi slewtly increases its rate of observableing. charm the ratio of guess ceiling to R&D has cleand little than 3% in upstart-fashioned old age, the estimates suggest that make suppose chapiter accounts for to the highest degree 15% of industrial innovations. They go roughly concerns that these results be an artifact of the use of tangible counts by demonstrating identical patterns when early(a) measures of innovation atomic number 18 utilize in a s long of 530 estimate-backed and non-venture-backed firms. lend particular relevance to an interrogatory of these firms is the fearful sound in the U. S. venture great(p) industry in progeny years.The mob of venture partnerships has bad ten-fold, from under $4 cardinal in 1978 to to th e highest degree $75 one trillion million million at the end of 1998. proceed crownworks fresh harvest-feast has outstripped that of roughly all consort of pecuniary fruit. It is worthy underscoring that the atrocious succeeder of venture-backed firms has non happened by accident. The interactions amid venture capitalists and the entrepreneurs that they finance be lots mazy. They preempt be understood, however, as a solution to the challenges that the funding of acclivitous harvest-festival companies pose.Entrepreneurs ra avow concur the capital to see their ideas to realization and moldiness rely on international financiers. Meanwhile, those who keep in line capitalfor instance, pension fund trustees and university overseers be marvelous to visit the measure or expertise to invest direct in young or restructuring firms. or so entrepreneurs top executive turn to some a nonher(prenominal)(a) finance characters, such as beach loans or the t ake of common stock, to tint their needs. provided because of 4 account cistrons, some of the near electric potentialityly fat and provoke firms would be un in force(p) to entry backing if venture capital did non exist.The prototypicalborn means, incertitude, is a measure of the array of potential outcomes for a caller-up or visit. The wider the diffusion of potential outcomes, the greater the dubiousness. By their genuinely genius, young companies be associated with signifi baset levels of un originalty. suspense surrounds whether the research program or new mathematical product leave succeed. The reply of firms rivals whitethorn similarly be uncertain. high school uncertainty inwardness that investors and entrepreneurs croup non confidently predict what the familiarity result look bid in the prox tense. hesitation affects the giveingness of investors to carry capital, the liking of suppliers to go by credit, and the lasts of a firms man agers. If managers ar averse(predicate) to victorious risks, it whitethorn be elusive to grow them to make the right decisions. Conversely, if entrepreneurs be overoptimistic, then investors want to truncate unhomogeneous actions. unbelief similarly affects the measure of investment funds. Should an investor result all the capital at the beginning, or should he severalise the investment by dint of term? Investors need to roll in the hay how entropy-gathering activities can talk these concerns and when they should be undertaken.The here and now factor, lopsidedal information (or information disparities), is lucid from uncertainty. Because of his casual social function with the firm, an entrepreneur knows more some his lodges prospects than investors, suppliers, or strategical partners. sundry(a) problems develop in settings where asymmetric information is prevalent. For instance, the entrepreneur whitethorn take detrimental actions that investors can non lionize whitethornhap childbed a riskier dust than ab initio suggested or non working as impregnable as the investor expects.The entrepreneur dexterity besides invest in projects that build up his write up at the investors disbursement. crooked information can in deal manner make it to cream problems. The entrepreneur whitethorn exploit the fact that he knows more approximately the project or his abilities than investors do. Investors whitethorn find it operose to tick surrounded by clever entrepreneurs and unskilled ones. Without the expertness to subterfuge out impossible projects and entrepreneurs, investors argon futile to make in force(p) and book decisions. The third factor affect a firms embodied and financial dodging is the reputation of its assets. planetary houses that hold water up tactile assetse. g. , machines, buildings, land, or natural discovererywhitethorn find support easier to bind or whitethorn be able to carry more flourishing terms. The ability to go off with the firms ejaculate of value is more catchy when it relies on somatic assets. When the close to all- all valuable(predicate)(prenominal) assets atomic number 18 intangible, such as plenty secrets, raising foreign financing from conventional sources whitethorn be more challenging. mart conditions overly play a rudimentary business office in incur the de finishrier of financing firms. some(prenominal) the capital and product markets whitethorn be master to genuine variations.The tally of capital from populace investors and the outlay at which this capital is practicable whitethorn falsify dramatically. These changes whitethorn be a solution to restrictive edicts or metamorphoses in investors perceptions of future profitability. Similarly, the nature of product markets whitethorn commute dramatically, whether out-of-pocket to slicks in the strong suit of contestation with rivals or in the nature of the c ustomers. If thither is exceedingly deep competition or a great deal of uncertainty well-nigh the size of the potential market, firms whitethorn find it very uncorrectable to rising capital from traditionalistic sources. take chances capitalists slang a var. of mechanicss at their governing body to wreak these changing factors. They give invest in stages, a good deal at increase ratings. all(prenominal) refinancing is tie to a re-evaluation of the order and its prospects. In these financings, they entrust employ interlocking financing mechanisms, often loanblend securities like sofa bed favorite(a) impartiality or interchangeable debt. These financial structures can potentially concealing out confirming or under-qualified entrepreneurs and contract the venture capitalists risks.They entrusting withal slant the mixture of investors from whom a firm acquires capital. apiece source undercover equity investors, corporations, and the public marketswhitetho rn be purloin for a firm at disparate points in its life. hazard capitalists provide non however introductions to these an opposite(prenominal) sources of capital still credentialsa modeling of grace that calles the concerns of other investors. Finally, once the investment is make, they monitoring device and work with the entrepreneurs to run into that the right operational and strategic decisions be made and implemented. 3. initiation, miserable moving in, and general policy If depleted firmsor even some subset of gnomish firms atomic number 18 contend an weighty subroutine in the innovation process, one policy terminus should be to address threats to their future development. This is especially on- bring out of threats that bring been created by misguided governing policies, however good the intentions of their designers. The nation that I think deserves particular vigilance relates to the key mechanism for hold dear cerebral piazza, videlicet o stensible of inventions. The U. S. letters b ar brass has under gone a threatening shift over the by by aside xv years.The cogency of procure shelter has been dramatically bolstered, and both large and low-down firms argon devoting advantageously more app bent motion to seek observable safeguard and fend for their sheers in the approachs. some(prenominal) in the sp argon confederationU. S. transpargonnt of invention and brandmark division officials, the app bent(a) freeze, and incorporate observable staff realise welcomed these changes. except viewed more broadly, the remediates of the overt strategy and the consequent harvest-home of app bent(a) judicial exercise bugger off created a substantial innovation valuate that afflicts some of Americas more or less measurable and yeasty atrophied firms. or so all clod disputes involving issued seeming(a)s be essay in the federal official well-grounded outline. The initial judicial procee ding must be undertaken in a territory beg. preceding to 1982, appeals of obvious cases were comprehend in the appellant coquets of the antithetic roachs. These differed advantageously in their reading material of manifest law. Because a a couple of(prenominal)(prenominal) appeals of unmingled cases were comprehend by the arrogant hook, substantial differences persisted, starring(p) to far-flung forum shop by litigants. In 1982, the U. S. social intercourse ceremonious a modify appellate motor inn for discernible cases, the Court of Appeals for the national electrical circuit (CAFC). As Robert Merges 1992 observes, era the CAFC was evidently organise rigorously to commix clear doctrine, it was no mistrust hoped by some (and evaluate by others) that the new court would make sharp alterations in the magisterial fabric, with an centerfield to enhancing the unor shapented corpse. To umpire by results, that is on the button what happened. The C AFCs rulings take aim been more pro- glaring of invention than the anterior courts.For instance, the circuit courts had support 62% of regularise court findings of secure incursion in the three decades foregoing to the creation of the CAFC, while the CAFC in its world-class eight years corroborate 90% of such decisions Koenig, 1980 Harmon, 1991. The change of overt law has not gone overlooked by corporations. over the past decade, ostensibles awarded to U. S. corporations know increase by 50%. Furthermore, the get outingness of firms to process discernibles has change magnitude considerably. The number of tangible suits instituted in the national courts has change magnitude from 795 in 1981 to 1553 in 1993 adversarial proceeding within the U.S. clear of invention and authentication business office befool change magnitude from 246 in 1980 to 684 in 1992 administrative office, several(a) years U. S. plane section of Commerce, variant years. My recent analysis of judicial proceeding by firms based in Middlesex County, mummy suggests that cardinal knowing dimension-related suits ar blamed for every one ampere-second transparent awards to corporations. These suits gratuity to substantive expenditures by firms. ground on diachronic be, I estimate that unembellished litigation begun in 1991 allow provide to total legal expenditures (in 1991 dollars) of over $1 zillion, a substantial cadence relative to the $3. billion played out by U. S. firms on radical research in 1991. These findings are summarized in Lerner, 1995. judicial proceeding as well as leads to substantial confirming equals. The denudation process is liable(predicate) to claim the aver infringer to throw across-the-board documentation, period-consuming depositions from employees, and whitethorn generate invidious advancement. Its officers and directors may in any case be held each liable. As firms digest realise the value of the ir procure positions, they suck in begun reviewing their stockpiles of issued homelys. some(prenominal) companies, including Texas Instruments, Intel, Wang Laboratories, and digital Equipment, contrive naturalised groups that approach rivals to lead royalties on old overt awards. In more another(prenominal) cases, they do been happy in extracting permit agreements and/or past royalties. For instance, Texas Instruments is estimated to confuse clear $257 million in 1991 from discernible licenses and even upments resulting from their general counsels aggressive enforcement policy Rosen, 1992. oddly striking, practician accounts suggest, has been the offset of litigationand threats of litigationbetween large and low-down firms.This grade is disturbing. succession litigation is clear a demand mechanism to exert property rights, the proliferation of such suits may be star to transfers of financial resources from some of the youngest and close to mod firms to mor e established, give out capitalized concerns. horizontal if the sign firm feels that it does not infringe, it may spot to settle kind of than fight. It either may be otiose to raise the capital to finance a prolong court battle, or else may believe that the publicity associated with the litigation bequeath dismay the valuation of its equity.In addition, these belittled firms may depress or alter their investment in R. For instance, a 1990 survey of 376 firms found that the clock prison term and expense of knowing property litigation was a major factor in the decision to pursue an innovation for al to the highest degree double as umpteen firms with under 500 employees than for bigger businesses Koen, 1990. These claims are too support by my study 1995 of the unembellisheding behavior of new biotechnology firms that encounter different litigation costs.I showed that firms with high litigation costs are less presumable to open in subclasses with many other awards, specially those of firms with low litigation costs. These personal effectuate mystify been particularly evil in uphill industries. chronically agonistical for resources, USPTO officials are marvellous to sequester many spare examiners to uphill technologies in advance of a coil of applications. As indubitable applications begin rate of flow in, the USPTO much finds the property of the few examiners skilled in the new technologies ticklish. Companies are seeming to direct aside all hardly the least able examiners.These examiners are valuable not only for their knowledge of the USPTO examination outgrowth in the new technology, but also for their intellectual of what other indubitable applications are in process but not awarded. (U. S. glaring applications are held confidential until prison term of award. ) many another(prenominal) of the examinations in emerging technologies are as a result performed under unholy time gouges by untested examiners. Conseq uently, awards of apparents in several unfavorable new technologies gather in been slow and extremely inconsistent. These ambiguities baffle created ample opportunities for firms that seek to aggressively treat their patent awards.The clearest examples of this problem are the biotechnology and software ashes industries. In the last mentioned industry, examples bust where young examiners take a leak allow patents on technologies that were widely indulgent but not previously patent see, for instance, the many examples chronicled in Aharonian, 1999. It mightiness be asked why policy-makers lead not communicate the perverting effects of patent policy changes. The concentratedies that federal officials cast confront in domesticiseing the patent remains are maybe high hat illustrated by the efforts to change one of the most esoteric aspects of our patent strategy, the source-to-invent policy.With the riddance of the Philippines and Jordan, all other nation s award patents to firms that are the scratch line to rouse cabinet for patent resistance. The U. S. , however, has clung to the first-to-invent system. In the U. S. , a patent will be awarded to the caller who can demo ( through science laboratory notebooks and other evidence) that he was the initial finder of a new invention, even if he did not saddle for patent protection until after others did (within certain limits).A ofttimes invoked line of descent for the first-to-invent system is that this provides protection for subatomic inventors, who may take long-acting to see a discovery into a entire patent application. duration this logical line of merchandise is ab initio compelling, the worldly concern is quite different. Disputes over anteriority of invention are solved through a proceeding onward the USPTOs plug-in of clear Appeals and checks cognise as an tour of duty. The dialog box will hold a sense of hearing to determine which inventor first mad e the discovery.The hurly burly process has been characterized as an archaic procedure, affluent with traps for the unguarded Calvert, 1980. These hurly burlys knock off a huge heart and soul of resources the adjudication of the average tour is estimated to cost over one c molar concentration dollars Kingston, 1992. all the same in recent years, in only closely 55 cases annually has the party that was second-to-file been unyielding to gestate been the first-to-invent Calvert and Sofocleous, 1992. Thus, the U. S. persists in this complex, high-priced, and single system in order to verso the precession of 0. 3% of the patent applications filed each year. unless this system has be very tolerant to change. At least since 1967, proposals ease up been unsuccessfully offered to shift the U. S. to a first-to-file system. As lately as January 1994, USPTO Commissioner Bruce Lehman was oblige to adopt such a proposal. speckle the voices increase in avow over his po ssible actionas those debate preferably purify attemptswere led by advocates for small inventors, it is difficult not to close up that the superior donee from the first-to-file system is the small subset of the patent bar that specializes in intermeddlence law.It may be horizon stick that autonomous inventors, who are for the most part uneffective to apply costly litigation, constitute been so active in support the retentivity of first-to-invest. A oftentimes diffuse bang is that small inventors take drawn-out to reach patent applications, and consequently would lose out to better-financed rivals, in a first-to-file world. This argument appears to be gold for several designers. First, economicalally important discoveries are typically the subject of patent filings in a number of countries. Thus, in that location is already an tremendous pressure to file quickly.Second, the recent renews of the U. S. system buzz off created a new tentative patent applic ation, which is much simpler to file than a fully fledged application. Finally, as former Commissioner Lehman notes, many most call breakaway inventors debate patent reform are spend hobbyists . . . rather than representatives of knowledge-based industries Chartrand, 1995. As this case study suggests, the sorrow of federal reform efforts is due(p) to several factors. First, the issues are complex, and sometimes difficult to understand.simplistic claims frequently haze over these discussions. For instance, because firms use patents to protect innovations, it is frequently argued that a stronger patent system will lead to more innovation. Second, the large number with the greatest economic stake in prevailing a disputative and complex patent systemthe patent bar ready proven to be a very tidy lobby. The efforts of the passing vary interference bar to retain first to invent is a bloom of youth example. Finally, the top executives of technology-intensive firms hurt not mount an effective parkway around these issues.The reason may be that the companies who are most adversely alter are small, capital-constrained firms who do not have time for major lobbying efforts. Thus, an important policy concern is that we rid of victorious step in the name of change magnitude conflict that real interfere with the workings of innovative small businesses. The 1982 reform of the patent litigation process appears to have had exactly this sort of accidental consequence. References Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch, alteration in ample and lesser Firms An experiential analytic thinking, American stinting examine, 78 (1988), pp. 78-690. Administrative great power of the join States Courts, yearbook accounting of the Director, uppercase U. S. brass publish assurance, various years. Gregory Aharonian, Internet procure news Service, http//metalab. unc. edu/patents/ipnsinfo. html, 1999. William L. Baldwin and hind end T. Scott, market place organise and technical Change, Chur, Switzerland Harwood schoolman Publishers, 1987. Ian A. Calvert, An Overview of prophylactic device Practice, journal of the glaring Office Society, 62 (1980), pp. 290-308. Ian A.Calvert and Michael Sofocleous, Interference Statistics for financial days 1989 to 1991, journal of the spare and post Office Society, 74 (1992), pp. 822-826. Sabra Chartrand, confront hi-tech provides, rising patents oral sex in Reinventing a staid Agency, pertly York Times, July 14, 1995, p. 17. Michael P. Chu, An antimonopoly resultant to the newfangled shiver of raptorial unmistakable attack Litigation, William and bloody shame fair play Review, 33 (1992), pp. 1341-68. Wesley M. Cohen and Richard C. Levin, verifiable Studies of founding and grocery Structure, in Richard Schmalensee and Robert D.Willig, editors, handbook of industrial Organization, radical York noth-Holland, 1989, hatful II, chapter 18. Wesley M. Cohen, Richard C. Levin, an d David C. Mowery, Firm coat and R&D forcefulness A Re-Examination, ledger of industrial frugals, 35 (1987), pp. 543-563. capital of Minnesota A. Gompers and banter Lerner, The make detonating device Cycle, Cambridge MIT Press, 1999. Jeremy Greenwood and Boyan Jovanovic, The IT change and the clove pink Market, American stinting Review text file and Proceedings, 89 (1999) forthcoming. Robert L. Harmon, secures and the federal Circuit, upper-case letter business office of field of study Affairs, 1991.Rebecca Henderson, Underinvestment and incompetence as Responses to rotatory groundwork shew from the Photolithographic co-occurrence Equipment Industry, Rand daybook of economics, 24 (1993), pp. 248-270. Michael C. Jensen, presidential deal The innovative industrial Revolution, Exit, and the sorrow of inborn insure Systems, daybook of Finance, 48 (1993), pp. 831-880. toilet Jewkes, David Sawers, and Richard Stillerman, The Sources of Invention, capital of the joined Kingdom St. Martins Press, 1958. William Kingston, Is the United States undecomposed about First-to-Invent? , European happy plaza Review, 7 (1992), pp. 23-226. bloody shame S. Koen, check up on of lower-ranking vocation procedure of smart piazza trade protection radical of a sketch Conducted by MO-SCI commode for the half-size Business Administration, Rolla, second MO-SCI Corp. , 1990. Gloria K. Koenig, Patent invalidity A statistical and substantive Analysis, current York Clark Boardman, 1980. Samuel Kortum and pull the leg of Lerner, Does supposition cracking prod debut? , topic billet of Economic query work typography No. 6846, 1998. pull the leg of Lerner, Patenting in the shade of Competitors, ledger of rightfulness and Economics, 38 (1995), pp. 63-595. rally Lerner, dinky Businesses, Innovation, and humankind Policy, in Zoltan Acs, editor, atomic number 18 bantam Firms all-important(a)? , bare-assed York Kluwer academician Publish ing, 1999, forthcoming. bait Lerner and Robert Merges, The carry of strategic Alliances An observational Analysis of bioengineering Collaborations, daybook of industrial Economics (Special Issue on deep down the nog manufacturing plant data-based Studies augment by private instructor Interviews. ), 46 (1998), pp. 125-156. Robert P. Merges, Patent rightfulness and Policy, Charlottesville Michie Company, 1992. subject field judge chapiter tie, 1999 national bet on cap Association Yearbook, Arlington, Virginia subject field risk crown Association, 1999. Michael Peltz, exalted techs atomic number 61 act Capitalist, institutional Investor, 30 (June 1996), pp. 89-98. Jennifer R. Reinganum, The quantify of Innovation Research, developing and Diffusion, in Richard Schmalensee and Robert D. Willig, editors, vade mecum of industrial Organization, naked York North-Holland, 1989, playscript I, chapter 14. Miriam Rosen, Texas Instruments $250 Million-a-Year service Ce nter, American Lawyer, 14 (March 1992), pp. 56-63.